‘Obsession’ Review

Love, Control, and the Horror of Wanting Too Much

Obsession (2026). Courtesy of Focus Features

There is something deeply unsettling about the idea of being loved for the wrong reasons. Not admired. Not understood. Not connected with. But wanted so intensely that the other person stops seeing you as a human being and starts seeing you as an answer to their own loneliness. That is the terrifying emotional core sitting underneath Curry Barker’s Obsession, a horror film that weaponizes romantic fantasy and slowly mutates it into something ugly, cruel, and emotionally suffocating.

I have been following Curry Barker’s work for a while now, so I went into Obsession with pretty high expectations. Thankfully, he really delivers here. What immediately stands out is the confidence of the filmmaking. Barker knows exactly what kind of tone he wants to create, and more impressively, he understands how fragile that balancing act actually is. This is a film constantly shifting between comedy, discomfort, psychological horror, and outright brutality, often within the same scene. Yet somehow it never completely loses control of itself.

The premise itself sounds deceptively simple. A hopeless romantic named Bear makes a wish using the mysterious "One Wish Willow" in hopes of finally winning over his longtime crush Nikki. What follows is not a fantasy fulfillment story, but a spiraling nightmare about coercion, emotional cowardice, and the horrifying consequences of forcing intimacy into existence.

The genius of the film lies in the fact that it understands the wish itself is not the real horror. The horror is the mindset behind it.

Bear does not make the wish because there was absolutely no possibility of connection between him and Nikki. In fact, the film quietly suggests the opposite. Their friendship already contains warmth, affection, humor, and genuine closeness. What Bear truly wants is not love. He wants certainty. He wants to bypass the vulnerability, awkwardness, and emotional risk that real connection demands. The wish becomes a shortcut around humanity itself.

That is where Obsession becomes far more psychologically rich than many recent horror films operating in similar spaces.

Michael Johnston plays Bear with an anxiety ridden fragility that works beautifully for the film. He captures the character’s quiet internalized cowardice so well that there are moments where you genuinely feel sympathy for him even while recognizing the damage he is causing. Barker smartly keeps us trapped inside Bear’s perspective for most of the runtime, which creates an uncomfortable emotional tension throughout the film. We are watching someone slowly realize the consequences of his actions while also continuing to exploit them.

But make no mistake, this is Inde Navarrette’s movie.

She is absolutely extraordinary here. Truly one of the standout horror performances of the decade so far. Nikki begins as someone grounded, warm, and recognizable, but after the wish takes effect, Navarrette transforms the character into something deeply uncanny and emotionally devastating. The way she moves, the way she pauses mid sentence, the way her body seems slightly disconnected from itself, it all creates this constant feeling that something is profoundly wrong beneath the surface.

There is one particular physical effect involving Nikki that becomes increasingly disturbing the longer the film goes on. Barker uses it sparingly enough that it never loses impact, and Navarrette commits to it completely. It is not flashy horror filmmaking. It is controlled, patient, deeply uncomfortable horror filmmaking.

That patience is probably what impressed me most about Obsession overall.

So much modern horror relies on loud jump scares, random visual interruptions, or endless fake outs to manufacture tension. Barker instead roots almost every scene in fundamentals. Tight editing. Carefully controlled lighting. Patient blocking. Sound design that slowly crawls underneath your skin. There were multiple scenes where absolutely nothing outwardly horrifying was happening, yet the theater felt completely frozen because of how the scene was framed and paced.

And the sound design deserves serious praise. Horror lives and dies through sound, and Obsession uses it masterfully. Certain moments hit with such sharp immersive force that you physically feel your body tense before your brain even fully processes what is happening. It constantly keeps the audience uneasy without overplaying its hand.

At the same time, Barker understands that horror and comedy often work best when they are sitting uncomfortably beside each other. Obsession swings wildly between absurd sight gags, awkward humor, disturbing violence, and genuinely emotional character moments. Sometimes the tonal pivots are intentionally jarring. Not every transition lands perfectly, especially in the third act where the comedy occasionally arrives too quickly after especially heavy scenes, but even then, the unpredictability becomes part of the experience.

There is also something refreshingly mean about the film.

Not cynical. Not edgy for the sake of it. Mean in the sense that it refuses to comfort its protagonist. Obsession understands the manipulative entitlement hiding underneath the so called “nice guy” fantasy, and it drags that fantasy into the ugliest corners imaginable. Barker takes the familiar romantic comedy structure and slowly exposes the ugliness buried beneath its wish fulfillment mechanics.

What if the dream girl stopped feeling like a person and became emotionally trapped inside someone else’s fantasy?

That question hangs over every frame of this film.

What makes it even more effective is that Barker never turns the film into a lecture. The themes around consent, coercion, agency, and emotional manipulation are all present, but they emerge naturally through character and atmosphere rather than through overt messaging. The film trusts the audience enough to sit with the discomfort.

And honestly, some of the scariest moments in the film are not the gore sequences, even though the practical effects here get impressively gnarly at times. The truly terrifying moments are the quieter ones where Nikki’s sense of self begins slipping away. Those scenes carry a sadness to them that lingers long after the shock fades.

There is one emotional truth at the center of Obsession that genuinely stuck with me after the credits rolled. Sometimes meaningful friendship already is a profound form of love. And sometimes the inability to recognize that can destroy the very thing you were trying to hold onto in the first place.

That emotional maturity is what elevates the film beyond being just another clever horror premise.

Not everything works perfectly. The mythology surrounding the wish occasionally becomes a little too explained toward the end, and some viewers may absolutely struggle with how the film frames certain moments from Bear’s perspective. I also think the film is strongest whenever it leans directly into Nikki’s experience, and there were moments where I wished Barker pushed even further into that territory.

Still, those issues never derailed the experience for me.

Because what Obsession does exceptionally well is make you feel trapped inside its emotional nightmare. It is thrilling, uncomfortable, funny, upsetting, and deeply human all at once. It feels like a haunted house attraction designed around modern loneliness and emotional insecurity.

Curry Barker announces himself here as a filmmaker with a genuinely exciting voice in horror. And alongside him, Inde Navarrette delivers the kind of performance that should immediately put the entire industry on notice.

I walked into Obsession expecting a smart little horror film with a fun premise.

I walked out feeling emotionally wrecked, deeply unsettled, and honestly a little haunted by it.

That is horror doing exactly what it is supposed to do.

Catch Obsession only in Theaters on May 15, 2026.

Rahul Menon is a screenwriter, filmmaker, and film critic who swapped a career in software analysis for the world of movies—and hasn’t looked back since. He holds an M.S. in Film Production & Media Management from Southern Illinois University Edwardsville and an MFA in Television and Screenwriting from Stephens College, where he completed multiple pilots and features under the guidance of industry mentors. He has also written, directed, and edited award-winning short films, and co-wrote an Indian feature film that went on to receive national recognition. His work spans comedy, thriller, and mystery, often infused with diverse voices and immigrant perspectives drawn from his own experiences. Beyond writing, Rahul has worked as a Key Production Assistant and Assistant Editor on films, TV, music videos, and commercials, and he regularly covers festivals like Sundance, SXSW, and AFI as accredited press. He also serves as a festival programmer for various film festivals and writes screenplay coverage for festivals and film markets, in addition to running his own blog, Awards Circuit Insider, where he writes about the ever-chaotic world of cinema and awards season. When he’s not writing or watching films (sometimes both at once), Rahul can usually be found debating movie scores, plotting comedy mysteries, or sneaking in a Letterboxd review. You can find him on Instagram @rahulmenonfilms, Letterboxd @rahulmenon, and his blog Awards Circuit Insider.